What is parodied in Gandhi II.?
Many of Mahatma Gandhi’s pricipals are parodied in the trailer. His idea of non-violent behaviour towards the enemy is one main aspect of Gandhi’s ideology. In the trailer he is presented as a bloodthirsty man, just waiting for his victims to cross his way. By acting this way the approve of passive-resistence by the ‘real’ Gandhi is parodied as well. In the trailer Gandhi seems to be a womanizer altough we know that Gandhi has always been faithful to his wife. On top of that the clip shows Gandhi eating meet (a steak!) and drives in a fancy sports car which is a contrast to his real attitude containing the ascet being of Gandhi, the rejection of eating a (to him) holy cow and of placing emphasis on materiasitic goods.
Why does one of the interviewed in ‘In Search of Gandhi’ state that nowadays Gandhi would grab a gun?
The documentary shows a contemporary image of India given by a film crew travelling in India, tracking down the path Gandhi took in the 1920’s and by which he inspired millions of Indians to stand up against the British colonial rule in India and to fight -non-violentely- for a independent democracy.
The movie reveals the Indian problems of the 21st century. Altough the country is officially a free democratic country there are grievances in a huge extend. The gap between the rich and the poor is frequently increasing, 80% of the population are considered as being ‘untouchables’ and the violence between Muslims and Hindus are still the order of the day. Thus the values which were so close to Gandhi’s heart have not endured the sixtieth anniversary of the Indian Independence.
The interviewer who claims that Gandhi would grab a gun in case that he was living in the year 2008 bases his argumentation on the perception that Gandhi’s ideas are not up to date anymore as they are contradictory to the modern appreciated accomplishments drawn by our globalised society. Nowadays the best way in which one earns respect in a community is to be succesfull, to make money and be forward-looking. As this is not an opportunity for the poor people in the country it intensifies the inequality of human beings. According to the interviewed person the Indian Independence was never obtained by all Indians. The destitutes just went from Britain dependence to that of the rich section of the population. Even a man like Gandhi with his steadfast ideals might have been desperate enough -in the light of the hopeless circumstances- to use violence and weapons.